Interview Scorecard Template
Scores against criteria set in advance, with evidence for each.
Details
interview scorecard templateUploads
Your logo
A photo or picture
Goes on this page only. Drag it anywhere and pull its corner to resize it.
Your signature
Draw it with a finger, a mouse or a trackpad, and it goes on the page like a picture.
Pictures and signatures stay on this device. Nothing is uploaded to a server.
Red highlights mark what is still blank. Click anything on the page to change it. Your draft is kept on this device as you work.
| Candidate | [candidate] |
| Role | [role] |
| Stage | [stage] |
| Interviewer | [name] |
| Date | October 14, 2026 |
| Criterion | Score /5 | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| [add criteria] |
Recommendation
[recommendation]
What is an Interview Scorecard?
An interview scorecard fixes what you are assessing before you meet anybody, and forces each interviewer to record evidence against it rather than an impression. It exists because unstructured interviews reward familiarity — panels hire the candidate who reminded them of themselves and write the justification afterwards. Without a scorecard, a hiring decision leaves no record of why one person was chosen, which is exactly what you need if the decision is challenged.
Recruiters and hiring managers use one for every stage involving a human judgement: screening call, technical exercise, panel, final. Public bodies, universities and regulated employers often require them, because their recruitment policies demand a documented and comparable basis for the decision. Panels use them to stop the loudest interviewer setting the tone in the debrief. They matter for internal moves and promotions too, where an unsuccessful internal candidate will ask why, and ‘not quite the right fit’ is not an answer anybody accepts from an employer they still work for.
Recruitment records are evidence in a discrimination complaint, and how long you must keep them, and what a candidate can ask to see, differ by jurisdiction: the Equality Act and UK GDPR in Britain, EEOC record-keeping rules under Title VII and the ADA in the US, provincial human rights codes in Canada, federal and state anti-discrimination law in Australia, and national implementations of EU equal treatment directives. Some jurisdictions also restrict what you may ask — salary history bans in several US states and cities are the familiar example. Check the retention period and the prohibited questions before designing the form.
A scorecard does not make the decision. It records evidence so that a group of people argue about the same thing; the appointment is still a judgement. It does not eliminate bias either, because interviewers still choose which evidence to write down — it makes bias visible and comparable, which is a different and more useful claim. And it is no substitute for a job description: if the criteria were not derived from the actual requirements of the role, you have only made an arbitrary decision look rigorous.
What to put in an Interview Scorecard
These are the details this template asks for. Anything left blank is marked in red on the preview so you can see what is still missing.
| Field | What goes in it |
|---|---|
| Issuing organisation | For example: Maple Grove Homeowners Association |
| Organisation address | For example: 1420 Kinnear Road, Columbus, OH 43212 |
| Candidate | For example: James Whitfield |
| Role | For example: Warehouse Supervisor |
| Interview stage | Free text |
| Interviewer | For example: Linda Alvarez |
| What you are assessing | One per line: Criterion | Score out of 5 | Evidence |
| Recommendation | Free text |
How to write an Interview Scorecard
Set the criteria before you advertise
Take the criteria from the job description, not from the CVs. Four to six is the working range — beyond that interviewers stop distinguishing between them. Split them into essential and desirable, and write down for each what you are looking for evidence of. Criteria invented after you have met a strong candidate will describe that candidate, which is the failure the scorecard exists to prevent.
Define what each score level means
A one-to-four scale with written anchors beats a one-to-ten with none. Say what a 2 looks like and what a 4 looks like for each criterion, in behavioural terms: ‘has run a migration of this scale end to end and can describe the rollback plan’ against ‘has taken part in one’. Without anchors, every interviewer uses the scale differently and the averages become meaningless.
Require evidence in the candidate's words
Each score needs a note of what the candidate actually said or did. ‘Described cutting the batch job from four hours to twenty minutes by re-indexing, gave the numbers unprompted’ is evidence. ‘Strong technically’ is a conclusion with nothing behind it. The evidence box is what makes a debrief productive, and it is what stands up if the decision is questioned later.
Split the interview across the panel
Assign criteria to interviewers so the same ground is not covered three times while something important is never tested. Give each person their questions in advance and ask them to score independently before the debrief. Panels that discuss first and score afterwards produce a single opinion with three signatures on it, which is worth less than three separate assessments that disagree.
Debrief against the scorecard, not the mood
Collect the independent scores, then work through the criteria where interviewers diverged — that is where the information is. Ask what evidence produced the difference. Record the decision, the reasons and who was present. Keep the completed scorecards for the period your jurisdiction requires for recruitment records, and store them where an unsuccessful candidate's data request can actually be answered.
Common mistakes
- Writing the criteria after interviewing a favourite candidate produces a scorecard that describes that person, so every other applicant is measured against an individual rather than a role.
- Scoring without written anchors means each interviewer uses the scale differently, and the averages hide the disagreement instead of showing it.
- Letting the panel discuss the candidate before scoring collapses three assessments into one, usually the most senior person's.
- Recording conclusions such as ‘good culture fit’ instead of evidence leaves you with a note that reads as bias if the decision is ever challenged.
- Losing the scorecards before the retention period that applies where you hire means you cannot answer a discrimination complaint with anything but memory.
Frequently asked questions
What is an interview scorecard?
A one-page form listing the criteria for a role, a defined rating scale, and space for each interviewer to record the evidence behind each rating. It is completed during or immediately after the interview and used in the debrief. The point is that everybody assesses the same things and the reasoning is written down while it is still accurate rather than reconstructed later.
How many criteria should an interview scorecard have?
Four to six for most roles. Beyond that, interviewers stop distinguishing between them and score everything the same way, which defeats the exercise. Take them from the job description, mark each essential or desirable, and if you end up with ten, ask which ones you would genuinely reject a strong candidate over. The rest are notes, not criteria.
Do interview scorecards reduce bias?
They make it visible and comparable rather than removing it. Criteria set in advance stop the decision drifting towards whoever seemed most familiar, and requiring written evidence exposes ratings with nothing behind them. Interviewers still choose what to record, so pair scorecards with the same core questions for every candidate and independent scoring before the debrief.
Should candidates see the scorecard?
Not usually during the process, but in several jurisdictions a candidate can request the personal data an employer holds about them, and interview notes and scores can fall within that. Write every comment on the assumption the candidate may read it. That single discipline improves the quality of the notes more than any training session on interview technique.
How long should we keep interview scorecards?
Long enough to answer a complaint, which means the retention period set where you hire — recruitment record rules differ across the UK, the US, Canada, Australia, the EU and India, and some are tied to the limitation period for discrimination claims. Check the current requirement for your location, set one retention rule, and apply it to every candidate rather than only the ones you hired.
This page explains general practice and is not legal advice. Requirements differ between countries and, in some cases, between states — check what applies where the document will be used.